If you participated in a college basketball bracket pool this year or listen to sports radio or watch ESPN, you've undoubtedly heard the term "chalk" numerous times. Normally it's used in this context: "The games are really going by the chalk this year." Simply put, it means the favorites are winning the games. Now how you define "favorites" can vary, but for the brackets it means whoever has the higher seed. The final eight teams (The Elite 8), consisted of all #1's in each of the four brackets playing the #2 seeded team except for one where the #1 was playing the #3 team instead. Still, no #10 seeds, no #7's, no #13's, just the teams who were supposed to win, winning. I tend to think it's not as much fun this way, but that's because I don't follow the sport as much and pretty much always cheer for the underdog.
Question of the day: where and of what did Al Capone die? Look away from the screen and think about it for a second. What's your answer? In prison and of syphilis right? Everyone knows the story; he went to prison on tax evasion charges, had already contracted syphilis and then died in jail powerless and penniless. Well, he actually did die of complications from syphilis, so that part is true. But he was in prison from 1932-1939 and then was released. He actually died eight years later just after his birthday at his home in Florida at the ripe old age of 48 (48!!!!).
The Trib sports section today had an article on the front page by Rick Morrissey entitled "Oh the horrors of making $7.2 million: why the Bears should stick it to Briggs". Now, if (when) I'm drunk and spout off about the topic in this way, fine. Heck, I can even write about it my blog since no one truly believes I'm in any way an expert on anything nor that my opinions should be listened to much less repeated. But this guy is practicing irresponsible journalism in my humble opinion. Briggs could play and accept the $7.2 million contract and I actually like to think that many players would.
However, you have to realize that contracts in the NFL are not guaranteed unlike baseball (I'm not sure about basketball and that game they play on ice....curling....no hockey, that's it). So it's not that Briggs was looking for more ANNUAL money, he just wants more GUARANTEED money. Pundits feel he could get $20 million guaranteed if he were to sign a new deal with another team. He wouldn't get $20 million a year, but he would eventually get it. If he played for the Bears, gets hurt in game one, that's it. I think he gets the $7.2 million, but he doesn't have anything else coming down the pipe. Viewed from that perspective, he's not being completely unreasonable in pulling the antics he's pulling and Morrissey doesn't address this issue. It's pretty irresponsible if you ask me. Not the first time....won't be the last.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
If -- IF -- you spout off? There's not much room to run on the factual front, Crazylegs!
Rick Morrissey is an idiot, Joe, and I'm surprised it's taken you this long to figure it out. I'll put it this way: For the last 3 years, he's been a Dusty shill/apologist.
The other thing to consider -- and correct me if I'm wrong because I'm not 100% familiar with NFL rules -- is that for Briggs is (or will be) essentially looking for his first chance to negotiate with the Bears and other teams an equal footing. Until now and through (at least) this season, his rights were controlled by the Bears, which gives the team tremendous leverage in negotiating a deal -- yes, the player can hold out (which happens all the time in football), but in the end, he's going to have to play for that team if he plays at all. He can't shop himself to the highest bidder like most of us can.
This will be the first time that Briggs has that ability. While $7.4mm is a lot of money, guaranteed or not, it is (by definition) *below* his market value. Briggs may be frustrating the Bears, but as far as I know, he hasn't violated his contract (yet) and he's only doing what he can to find himself the best deal he can.
I see it's left to me to leave a totally-uninformed sports comment. Uh... I agree! With whatever.
C'mon Red Rodent, I don't spout off THAT much....just when I drink......anything.
Alexis! I put the Capone stuff in there, that was interesting wasn't it? And the Chalk discussion was instructional, for the next time you're having dinner with a sports fan over Turkish wine!!
You know dejesus, I really never even take note of who writes what. Normally I just read the paper for the facts and avoid these opinion pieces, which is why I don't read editorials, and hence really don't know who is a dope and who isn't. This one got my attention because it seemed so inflammatory. We're both arguing the same point though, that Briggs is just doing what he can to get the best deal he can. We shouldn't judge until we're in their shoes.
Post a Comment